Catalyze Innovation that Advances Health

Detailed View

A detailed view of vendor user-centered design processes, summative testing methodologies, and summative testing results is illustrated below. We assigned five (5) points to each of these three dimensions for a total of 15 possible points. A detailed explanation of the point assignment process can be found on the methodology page. The table below shows the point assignments and specific details from the vendor safety enhanced design reports.

How to Read this Table:

For each dimension and sub-component the table shows the points assigned to that vendor and below the point value is the specific data for that vendor as extracted from the vendor report retrieved from the ONC's certified health product list. The table can be sorted by each dimension and sub-component by clicking on the arrows next to the header names.

how_to_read.updated.10.12

EHR Vendor UCD Process Testing Methodology Testing Results Total Score
  Reported Process

Max pts:5
Participants

Max pts:1
Clinical Expertise

Max pts:2
Use Cases

Max pts:1
Metrics

Max pts:1
Effectiveness

Max pts:3
Improvements

Max pts:2
 

Allscripts Enterprise EHR

v11.4.1

5

5

NIST 7741

1

18.2

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

84.8

3

84.8

2

Detailed

15

15

Allscripts Sunrise Acute

v15.1-c INPATIENT

5

5

NIST 7741

1

18.8

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

94.4

3

94.4

2

Detailed

15

15

Amazing Chart

v7.0

5

5

ISO 9241-210

0

9.3

2

100%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

93.4

3

93.4

.5

Scant

12

12

Athena Clinicals

v14.9

5

5

Own process

1

19.1

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

93.8

3

93.8

.5

Scant

13.5

13.5

Cerner

Powerchart INPATIENT 2012.01.34

5

5

Own process

.5

12.4

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

86.1

3

86.1

.5

Scant

13

13

Dr Systems

eHR MU v2.0

0

0

No stated process

0

3.8

.5

20%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

90.8

3

90.8

2

Detailed

7

7

E-MD

Solution Series v8

5

5

ISO 9241-210

1

22

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

0

Incomplete

0.0

0

N/A

2

Detailed

11

11

eClinical Works

Version 10

0

0

No stated process

0

4

.5

50%

0

0

No Details

1

Complete

82.1

3

82.1

.5

Scant

5

5

Epic Systems

EpiCare Ambulatory 2014 (Epic2012)

5

5

Own process

1

51.7

2

100%

0.5

.5

Vague

0

Incomplete

0.0

0

N/A

.5

Scant

9

9

GE Healthcare 1

Centricity Enterprise v6.11

5

5

ISO 62366

.5

14.1

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

74.5

0

74.5

2

Detailed

11.5

11.5

Greenway

PrimeSUITE 2014(17.0)

0

0

No stated process

0

9.7

.5

80%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

86.5

3

86.5

2

Detailed

7

7

McKesson

Paragon 12&2.0 INPATIENT

5

5

NIST 7741

1

17

2

100%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

80.6

3

80.6

2

Detailed

14.5

14.5

McKesson Specialty Health

iKnowMedEHR v6.7

5

5

NIST 7741

1

16.1

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

80.3

3

80.3

2

Detailed

15

15

Medhost

EDIS v4.4 INPATIENT

5

5

Own process

0

5

2

100%

0

0

No Details

1

Complete

99.99

3

100

.5

Scant

11.5

11.5

Medical Information Technology

MPM 5.6.6

5

5

Own process

.5

10.4

2

100%

0

0

No Details

1

Complete

94.9

3

94.9

2

Detailed

13.5

13.5

Meditech Magic

Core HCIS 5.66 INPATIENT

5

5

Own process

0

5

2

100%

0

0

No Details

1

Complete

99.99

3

100

2

Detailed

13

13

Modernizing Medicine

EMA 4.0.0.2

5

5

Own process

1

24

.5

54%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

55.8

0

55.8

.5

Scant

8.5

8.5

Nextgen Healthcare

Ambulatory 5.8.2

0

0

No stated process

.5

13

2

100%

1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

81.0

3

81

2

Detailed

9.5

9.5

Practice Fusion

v3.1

5

5

ISO 9241-210

0

7.5

2

100%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

86.4

3

86.4

2

Detailed

13.5

13.5

SRSsoft

v9

5

5

ISO 9241-210

0

9.5

.5

84.6%

0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

94.1

3

94.1

2

Detailed

12

12

Non-Endorsement Disclaimer: In publishing this report, neither MedStar Health nor the American Medical Association is endorsing any EHRs or other technology. This report was not sponsored, funded or in any way facilitated by any EHR or similar technology vendor. User decisions regarding the selection of EHR technologies, products and services must take into account many varied characteristics, which are beyond the scope of this report.

Footnotes

1. The UCD process for the GE Centricity ambulatory product was stated in the CHPL report for the inpatient GE Centricity product.